Categories
Self Publishing Advice Writing Advice

An author’s guide to the editing process

An author’s guide to the editing process

In the lifespan of a novel, it’s easy to think that editing comes at the end. 

In its most simplified form, you might map the process of writing a book like this: 

First, a writer has an idea. 

Then a writer writes several drafts. 

Then an editor revises the book. 

Then a publisher gets the book on shelves. 

An image shows a four-step process under the words The Writing Process with idea, represented by a light bult, draft by a pen and paper, a check mark for edit, and then a book store icon for publish.

In reality, it’s a lot more complicated than that, because “editing” isn’t just one thing—there are many different kinds of editing, and they happen at different stages of the ideation, drafting, and revision process. The pathway to publication also plays a big role in how and when editing comes into play. 

The process looks more like this: 

In other words, it’s complicated! But the revision and editing process is vital, and there is no pathway to successful publication without editing. 

With the right editor (or editors) in your corner, the whole process is easier to manage, and will help you grow and evolve as a writer. 

Invisible Ink has been collaborating with authors since 2012. We’ve broken down the entire editing process and answered the most-common questions we receive from authors entering the editing process for the first time. 

Revising vs. editing vs. drafting: What do these terms mean?

Before we get too far down the editing rabbit hole, let’s define a few key terms. These three words are often conflated, but in the editing and publishing world, they have distinct meanings: 

Revising and editing both refer to the process of going back over a piece of writing to refine and improve it. But these two words refer to slightly different approaches to this process: 

Revising is about big picture changes: plot adjustments, adding or changing characters, reworking the structure of your book, and so on. 

Editing has more to do with adjusting the text itself. Refining language, rewriting sections for more clarity, tightening the syntax, double-checking grammar. 

There is a lot of overlap between revising and editing, and even professional editors will sometimes use these two terms interchangeably. However, for authors, revising and editing require different mindsets and different relationships with professional editors—more on that later in this article.

Drafting is another related term that refers to the entire process of turning an idea into a manuscript. The drafts you create are a result of revision, and once you are done drafting, you’ll be ready to move into the editing stage. 

The art of self-revision and editing

Drafting, revising, and editing all fall under the umbrella of “writing.” Too often, people think of writing as purely the generation of new text, but in reality, the vast majority of the work of writing happens after the first draft is done.

Revising and editing your own work can be challenging, but it is an essential skill that all serious writers must develop with practice. A professional editor can help you develop this skill by working alongside you, but even with a book coach, you’ll still be revising your early drafts yourself. 

We have a guide on self-editing your manuscript right here.

Getting feedback: Book coaching, writing groups, beta readers

The self-editing process shouldn’t happen in isolation. Writers should get feedback as they are drafting, though they must walk a delicate balance: being open-minded to critiques while also trusting their own writerly instincts. 

You have a number of options for gathering feedback.

Our book coaching service is designed for authors at any stage of the drafting process.During book coaching, an Invisible Ink editor works with you as you generate and revise drafts. Our job is to provide feedback and encouragement along the way, to act as a sounding board, and to help you stay accountable and productive.

Typically with book coaching, we’ll schedule regular face-to-face meetings with authors so we can have an active dialogue about the book as it develops. We’ll continue this relationship for as long as you find it useful. Often we’re by the author’s side all the way through publication.

For folks who have a partial or complete draft of a manuscript, another option is to undergo manuscript evaluation. A professional editor will read what you have, even if it’s mostly an outline or a few chapters or unfinished stories, and provide feedback and guidance on how to develop what you have into a more complete draft. This is a great, more affordable option for people who want professional feedback but aren’t ready for full professional editing yet.

Writing groups

Writing groups are one of the best ways to get feedback on your work as you’re drafting and revising. The connections and creative inspiration are icing on the cake. 

Where can you find writing groups? The best place to start is  your own community—local writing centers, libraries, book stores, and community centers often have writing meetups. You can also use Reddit forums and Substack to find digital writing groups. Normally, you won’t need to pay anything to be part of a writing group—just be willing to share your own feedback on others’ writing as part of the exchange. 

Beta readers

Beta readers are people who read unpublished manuscripts and provide their feedback. They are an important part of the revision and editing process, and it’s best to seek out beta readers before you start the latter stages of editing. 

Check out our full guide to finding beta readers, or watch this short reel from our Instagram for more guidance: 

How do you know when it’s time for a professional editor?

There is no easy answer to this question, because it will depend on how you like to work, what your budget is, and what pathway you plan to take to publication. 

How you publish changes how you edit

Authors today have more options than ever when it comes to publishing their work. For help designing your own pathway to publication, check out this article: Self-publishing vs. traditional publishing: Which one is right for you? 

Traditional publishing: If you plan to publish your book with a publishing house, you will very likely be assigned an editor by your agent or publishing house. However, folks who plan to publish through the traditional route still often go through manuscript evaluation or developmental editing with an independent editor to increase their chances of landing a publishing deal. A well-edited manuscript has a far better chance of landing you a deal than one that hasn’t been through the editing process. 

Hybrid and indie press: If you are working with a smaller publishing house, it’s very possible they will assign you an editor. Invisible Ink Editing has partnered with several small presses, so don’t be surprised if your indie publisher pairs you with an independent editing group like ours. 

Self-publish: The most successful self-published authors build their own publishing house, which includes hiring an editor. Typically, self-published authors may also hire a book coach as their editor early in the process, or undergo all three stages of book editing, broken down below. 

When to reach out to a professional editor

If you are self-publishing but not working with a book coach, then it’s up to you to decide when it’s right to work with a professional editor. 

Here are a few signs that it may be time: 

  • You can’t go any further yourself. You’ve written several drafts and revisions, and now you are just pushing around commas and changing words. You may still feel like there is some editing to do, but if all the big stuff is done, it may be time to call in a professional editor.
  • You’ve incorporated beta reader feedback. Some writers may choose to go through developmental editing before they send their manuscript out to beta readers, but others will wait until they’ve gotten beta-reader feedback to incorporate. Both approaches work.

Note: Most independent editors are booked out weeks or months in advance. Keep that in mind as you are planning your editing. It’s not a bad idea to reach out to a professional editor several weeks before you finish self-revision, or while your manuscript is out with your beta readers so you won’t have to wait several weeks before an editor can pick things up. 

Ready to submit your work?

If you think your work is ready for an editor, we want to see it! Use the form below to send us an excerpt, and one of the editors on our team will give you a free sample edit, plus advice on the best next step.

The different types of professional editing

Professional editing typically falls into three different stages. Most manuscripts will go through all three stages before they are published, though some authors may use different editors for different stages, or may forgo developmental editing if they’ve gone through a rigorous critiquing and self-revision process. 

The best thing to do is submit a sample of your manuscript and let an editor give you guidance on which level of editing is best for you. When you submit your manuscript, you’ll be matched up with the editor on the team who is the most experienced with your genre and whose schedule best aligns with your launch strategy. 

They will provide you a free sample edit of a portion of your manuscript and provide guidance on where to begin. They will recommend one of the following services: 

This is the earliest stage of professional editing, when your editor will be focused on the big-picture elements of your manuscript. They will read through the whole thing and take detailed notes on structure, plot, characters, style, setting—-all of the foundational elements of your book. They will compile a critique—at Invisible Ink, these are usually around 5–10 single-spaced pages for a full-length novel—with their feedback and guidance on how to address it. 

Developmental editing is the first stage of the editing process because it’s usually followed by significant revisions that add or remove content from the manuscript. There’s no point in moving on to the next stage until the heavy lifting of developmental editing is complete.

During the line editing phase, your editor will go much deeper into the actual text. They will provide in-line edits to improve syntax, smooth out clunky sentences, fix glaring errors such as incomplete sentences or repeated phrasing, and in some cases rewrite sentences or provide guidance for you to do more intensive rewriting on your own. The goal of line editing is to turn your developed manuscript into something that’s nearly ready for publication.

The final stage of book editing is proofreading, which is when your editor will go through the manuscript to tidy up any remaining typos, formatting issues, or other minor mistakes that slipped through the previous rounds of editing. Because line editing often requires so much revision, it inevitably introduces errors into the manuscript. Proofreading is the final polish that eliminates those errors before it goes to print. 

How long does the editing process take?

The entire editing process can vary from a few weeks to a few months, depending on a few variables. 

The length of the manuscript. Longer books obviously take more time to edit! This is why our editing prices are based on word count, not per project. 

The type of editing. Some rounds of editing take longer than others. Typically, line editing is the most time-consuming, usually 4–8 weeks for a full-length manuscript (80,000–100,000 words). Developmental editing and proofreading usually happen within 3–6 weeks for a full-length book, because editors are making fewer in-line changes as they are reading. 

Your own revision timelines. In between each step of the editing process, you’ll need to revise and edit. How quickly you do impacts the overall timeline. Your editor will discuss this timeline with you during the onboarding process. 

What to expect when working with an editor

Working with a professional editor may feel intimidating if you’ve never done it before, but take it from us: The author-editor relationship is a very powerful, special thing that can transform your writing and the trajectory of your work. 

When you work with an Invisible Ink editor, here’s what you can expect: 

A committed partnership. We see authors as partners. When you hire us, we become a member of your publishing team, and we are committed to seeing your work through until it’s ready for publication—and beyond! Even after our authors are published, we are there to champion and help promote their books on our socials, and we are always ready to work on their next books and series. A partnership with an Invisible Ink Editor often lasts for a writer’s entire career. 

Clear communication. You are trusting us with your work, so it’s our duty to make sure you know exactly what we are doing. Your editor will give you a clear estimated timeline at the start of the project and provide updates as they are moving through the manuscript so you can manage your own timeline. They will also be available for questions and discussions with you during and after the editing process. 

Fair prices based on industry standards. Pricing can vary wildly in the editing industry, but most experienced and legitimate editors will be within the rates tracked by the Editorial Freelancers Association

100% human feedback. Invisible Ink Editors don’t use AI to edit our clients’ work, ever. You can read all about it on our AI policy page. We guarantee that a human being (one with years of editorial experience) will read every word of your manuscript and write every piece of communication and feedback without the help of AI. That’s how we’ve been doing it for two decades, and we don’t see any reason to change that now. 

Want to find out what it’s like working with a professional editor firsthand? Submit a sample of your manuscript to Invisible Ink Editing, and we’ll be happy to show you. 

Categories
Writing Advice

How to find filter words and filter them out

Filter words. Think you’ve never heard of them? If you’re an author, I can guarantee you include them in your writing—and often. Filter words can be a big problem for any author, but they are particularly pesky for newer writers who may not be as familiar with  the concept just yet. Fear not—we are here to explain what filter words are, why they’re (usually) a problem, and how you can eliminate them in your fiction writing.

What are filter words?

Essentially, filter words (sometimes known as filter phrases) are words a writer uses to show a scene, setting, or situation through a character’s perspective. While that may not sound like a bad thing (and indeed, sometimes it isn’t), there are a few common issues that can crop up with filter words:

    • Filter words add a layer or interruption between the reader and the scene you are painting.
    • Filter words often make sentences feel clunky or overly wordy.
    • Filter words can cause repetition.

Susan Dennard of Pub(lishing) Crawl sums it up nicely: “Filters are words or phrases you tack onto the start of a sentence that show the world as it is filtered through the main character’s eyes.”

Of course you want your reader to live the characters’ experience, but filter words won’t help you. They’re some of the weakest words you can write, in fact, because instead of putting your reader in the character’s shoes, you’re putting another layer between them.

Filter words list

As a book editor, I make it a point to eliminate unnecessary filter words in every manuscript I work on. Susan Dennard provides this list of common filter words to look for, and I’ve added a couple more for good measure:

    • to see
    • to hear
    • to think
    • to touch
    • to wonder
    • to realize
    • to watch
    • to look
    • to seem
    • to feel (or feel like)
    • can/could/couldn’t
    • to decide
    • to know
    • to sound like
    • to notice
    • to be able to
    • to note
    • to experience
  • to remember

Filter out the filter words for a stronger narrative.

And these are just the most common ones! To show you their devastation in action, here’s an example of a short, filter-ful paragraph with the filter words bolded:

Maria noticed James had gone silent and was staring past her out the coffee shop window. Turning and looking herself, she saw a beautiful woman on the sidewalk, talking animatedly on a mobile phone. Maria felt a little tug of jealousy, and she turned back around furiously and stared at James, who jumped and looked down at his espresso. She realized he wasn’t blushing, but he seemed uncomfortable. “Who is that?” she asked as she watched his face for any sign of guilt. She wondered if he could ever tell her the truth. She decided right then this would be his last chance to regain her trust.

And here it is reworked slightly with the filter words eliminated:

James had gone silent and was staring past Maria out the coffee shop window. A beautiful woman was outside, talking animatedly on her mobile phone. Jealousy tugged at Maria’s gut, and she glared at James, who jumped and shifted his eyes to his espresso. He wasn’t blushing, but that didn’t mean anything. “Who is that?” she asked. Was he guilty again? Was he even capable of telling the truth? Perhaps he deserved one more chance to regain her trust. 

The difference between these two paragraphs is striking. By removing the filter words from a first person narrative, you’ll coax out your narrator’s voice so it rings clearly in the reader’s mind. And regardless of the POV, your reader will feel the experience of your characters more deeply and directly.

How to eliminate filter words in your writing

It’s almost impossible to write a novel manuscript without having some (or many) filter words slip into your text. Reviewing this list ahead of a long writing session, however, will keep them in mind as you are writing, and hopefully help you avoid them as you work.

Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to edit out filter words in your writing. But with a bit of dedication (and time, of course), you can use the trusty “find” function in your writing software of choice to scan for the above phrases. It may not eliminate every instance of filter words, but it’s a great place to start and will help you get a better sense of how often you’re using them.

Sometimes filter words are an essential part of the meaning of the sentence, and in those rare cases, you’ll want to keep them in. But knowing which ones to strike and which to keep requires just a little bit of critical thinking. When you’re editing your own work, ask yourself: What essential information am I leaving out by removing this filter word and/or restructuring the sentence? If the answer is “none,” then put a line through it or hit that delete key.

You may be unable to keep yourself from writing filter words in a first draft, but after a while, filtering out the filters will become second nature—and your manuscripts will be stronger as a result.

For more examples of filter words in action, check out Pub(lishing) Crawl and Write it Sideways.

Categories
Writing Advice

You might not know you’re making these grammar mistakes, part 2

By Leah Wohl-Pollack, Lead Editor This is part two of our series on common grammar mistakes you might not know you’re making. Check out part 1, which covers misplaced modifiers and dangling participles, here. In this post, we’ll cover two more grammar mistakes indie writers often make: passive voice and run-on sentences. By the end of this post, I hope you feel a little more confident about editing your writing for grammar. It's called grammar

1. Passive voice

You may or may not remember from English class that all verbs are either active or passive in voice. In sentences with active verbs, the subject takes responsibility for the action. With passive voice, the action is not attributed to a subject at all. Despite what you might have heard, passive voice isn’t inherently bad; in fact, it makes frequent appearances in political and legal writing, and with good reason. It can be useful for a writer who wants to avoid attributing responsibility to a particular person or group:

The president was advised not to sign the bill.

In this example, the writer may not want to list out who advised the president, so the passive form is appropriate. Passive voice is also useful when the “do-er” of the sentence isn’t necessarily important:

The constellation can be observed from September to February.

Since anyone with the ability to see and a view of the night sky can observe the constellation, using the passive form of the verb is fine to keep the subject open. Twinkling stars But when you’re writing fiction, you’ll probably want to avoid the passive voice (except in a few special cases). In order to drive the narrative forward on a sentence-by-sentence basis, you must allow—nay, encourage!—your subjects to own their actions. Here’s an example of passive voice that I might come across when editing fiction:

Mike’s breath was held as Lynn peered over the edge of the cliff.

It’s almost definitely important to the narrative that Mike is nervous about Lynn’s safety, and describing Mike holding his breath is a good storytelling choice when you consider the concept of show vs. tell. But the passive form of the verb (was held) is clunking everything up. This use of the passive voice attributes the action to no subject at all, even though the subject here is essential to the story. To rephrase the sentence with active voice, we simply need to attribute the action (held) to the correct subject (Mike):

Mike held his breath as Lynn peered over the edge of the cliff.

What a difference! This switch to active voice keeps the sentence flowing smoothly, and the reader stays immersed in the scene. It also helps show what Mike is feeling without telling the reader outright.

2. Run-on sentences

Generally speaking, a sentence (also known as an independent clause) is made up of a subject and a verb. A compound sentence contains two or more independent clauses tied together with either a conjunction or a punctuation mark. Sometimes, you might find yourself tying together multiple independent clauses—but you’ve neglected to include the appropriate conjunction(s) or punctuation. Enter the dreaded run-on sentence. As a book editor, I come across these puppies here and there. But how are you supposed to recognize a run-on sentence when you’re self-editing your novel? Here’s an example of a run-on sentence:

I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing it is always easy to concentrate there.

This sentence contains two independent clauses that haven’t been properly tied together; in other words, it’s missing a conjunction and/or punctuation mark. If you’re not immediately sure whether a sentence you’ve written is a run-on, or you know it’s a run-on but can’t tell where the missing conjunction or punctuation mark should go, you can try the question trick. This is a simple method that involves turning your sentence into a yes-or-no question. If the whole sentence can be easily rephrased into a single question, it’s not a run-on. If it needs to be turned into two questions, then you know it’s a run-on and you know where to put the missing conjunction or punctuation! Let me show you how it’s done. Using the example above, we find the first part of the sentence is easily turned into a single yes-or-no question:

Do I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing?

But if we try to turn the entire sentence into a single question, it doesn’t fly:

Do I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing it is always easy to concentrate there?

To make it work, we would need two separate questions:

Do I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing? Is it always easy to concentrate there?

This trick has shown us we definitely have a run-on sentence on our hands. On top of that, we also know exactly where in the sentence to insert the missing piece: between the words writing and it is. In this case, we could solve the problem in two ways: either using a punctuation mark on its own, or a conjunction with a punctuation mark. Using a punctuation mark:

I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing; it is always easy to concentrate there.

Note that not just any punctuation mark will work. In this example, inserting a comma instead of a semicolon would create another problem: a comma splice. But if you despise semicolons or would just rather use a comma, be sure to pair it with the appropriate conjunction. conjunction-junction Using a conjunction with a punctuation mark:

I love to go to the coffee shop next door to work on my writing, because it is always easy to concentrate there.

That wraps up part 2 of our series on grammar mistakes you might not know you’re making. With these two posts, I hope to prepare you to tackle your self-editing head-on. At the same time, we all know catching every one of your own grammar errors is darn near impossible. That’s why, after you’ve done your part, you can send your manuscript to Invisible Ink, where we’ll fix your errors and keep your voice.

Categories
Writing Advice

You might not know you’re making these grammar mistakes

By Leah Wohl-Pollack, Lead Editor This may come as a shock, considering I’ve been known to fall asleep cradling my Chicago Manual of Style, but I don’t believe proper grammar is the be-all and end-all when it comes to good creative writing. Like to split infinitives? No problem. Want to end a sentence in a preposition? Be my guest. But when you’re an indie author writing a novel, there are a few style and grammar rules you should always pay attention to. (See what I did there?) In this post, I’ll give you a rundown of two common grammar mistakes—misplaced modifiers and dangling participles—and some tools you can use to eliminate them from your writing. Check that grammar

1. Misplaced modifiers

Misplaced modifiers are among my favorite grammar mistakes, mostly for their unintended humor. Modifiers come in several forms: words, phrases, and clauses. Because they warrant their own discussion, we’ll cover modifying phrases/clauses in the next section on dangling participles. Right now, let’s look at the issue of misplaced adjectives and adverbs. As you may know, a modifier is a word or phrase that describes a noun within the same sentence. It usually describes the noun it is closest to, which is why misplacing one can cause undesired absurdity or confusion. Here’s an example of a sentence with a misplaced adjective:

The flimsy man’s kite ripped when it got caught in a tree.

Spoken aloud, the meaning may or may not be clear, but written down, there’s an obvious problem. The adjective flimsy is meant to describe the noun kite, but in its current placement, it’s modifying the noun man. Placing the modifier correctly would look like this:

The man’s flimsy kite ripped when it got caught in a tree.

 

strike-that-reverse-it

Easy enough. But what about when a misplaced modifier is an adverb rather than an adjective? For example:

They considered whether to play the game Sarah had brought thoughtfully.

While Sarah may have consciously brought a particular game to the party, to say she had brought it thoughtfully doesn’t make a lot of sense. Instead, the modifying adverb thoughtfully should be moved to sit in front of the verb it is intended to modify.

They thoughtfully considered whether to play the game Sarah had brought.

A misplaced adverb can also cause something called a squinting modifier—a modifier that could potentially look toward (hence the word “squinting”) either the noun before or after it. Take a look at the example below, as squinting modifiers can be tricky to spot.

Runners who practice often can go longer distances before getting tired.

The squinting modifier in this sentence allows for two potential interpretations:

Runners practice often so they can go longer distances. Runners can often go longer distances as a result of practicing.

How you fix this sentence will depend on your intended meaning. If it’s the first meaning you’re going for, you could try rephrasing the sentence without an adverb to avoid further confusion:

Regular practice helps runners go longer distances before getting tired.

If it’s the second meaning, you could try a more descriptive adverb:

Runners who practice can usually run longer distances before getting tired.

 

2. Dangling participles

As I mentioned earlier, dangling participles are a particular kind of misplaced modifier, and an incredibly common one at that—I find at least one in every novel I edit. In order to understand how not to dangle participles, let’s start with a quick refresher on what they are. To form a participle, take any verb (let’s go with sleep) and add an -ing ending. Then you have the present participle of the verb (sleeping). To use the present participle as a modifier, you could write:

Don’t wake the sleeping cat.

The participle sleeping acts as a modifier for the noun cat.   sleeping-cat Still with me? Good. Let’s move on to participial phrases. A participial phrase contains a participle and modifies the subject of a sentence. It’s just like the sleeping cat, but it has two clauses instead of one. Here’s an example of a participial phrase used correctly:

Smiling at everyone she passed, Stacy walked to the restaurant.

          Participial phrase (modifier): Smiling at everyone she passed           Subject of the sentence (noun): Stacy A dangling participle typically occurs at the beginning of a sentence, like with the previous example, but unlike the misplaced modifiers we covered in section one, you can’t fix a dangling participle just by moving it to a different spot in the sentence. The reason is that a dangling participle ties the modifier to the wrong subject, usually because the subject is either missing or in the wrong place. Here’s an example of a sentence with a dangling participle at the beginning—a popular construction:

Watching the clock, the minutes drag by.

So the participial phrase occurs right at the beginning of the sentence; that’s fine. The problem occurs in the second clause, where we seem to have a missing persons case on our hands. Here, the minutes take the subject’s place. In other words, the minutes are watching the clock. How do you fix this? Well, somebody must be watching the clock, and it’s certainly not the minutes. Insert the correct subject, and you’ve got a complete sentence again:

Watching the clock, Stacy felt the minutes drag by.

This solution works, although it requires an extra verb that also happens to be a filter word (feel). Not the best choice stylistically.   star-wars-bad-feeling Another solution would be to rephrase the sentence so the subject comes first:

Stacy watched the clock, feeling the minutes drag by.

That works—but that extra filter word feel is still sneaking in. To get rid of it, we could try rephrasing another way:

Stacy watched the clock as the minutes dragged by. -or- The minutes dragged by as Stacy watched the clock.

The last option is my favorite for its slightly stronger voice, but there’s nothing wrong with the other options if they suit your style.   Hopefully this post has given you some insight into two common grammar rules worth paying attention to as you’re writing and editing your novel. Don’t be discouraged if you find you struggle with these mistakes—many writers do! Thanks for reading, and keep an eye out for the second part of this series—we’ll tackle passive voice and run-ons, two more of the most common grammar mistakes in creative writing.
Categories
Self Publishing Advice Writing Advice

Author Cate Beauman takes us inside her wildly popular Bodyguards of L.A. County series

cate head shot

Cate Beauman fell into writing more than she dreamed of it. “Writing novels never made my bucket list,” she says. “One day I picked up a pad of paper and scribbled down the thoughts in my head. Next thing I knew, I had over 100,000 words. I’ve been obsessed ever since; now I can’t imagine doing anything else.”

A former New England resident, Cate now makes her home in North Carolina with her husband, two boys, and their St. Bernards, Bear and Jack.

Cate is currently working on Reagan’s Redemption, the eighth novel in her best-selling romantic suspense series, The Bodyguards Of L.A. County.

For information on new releases, monthly giveaways, and upcoming events, sign up for Cate’s newsletter. Cate can be reached on her website, www.catebeauman.com, or on her Facebook page. You can follow Cate on Twitter @CateBeauman.

Tell us how you originally got the idea for the Bodyguards of L.A. County series.

I never planned to write a series. The thought never occurred to me as I wrote Morgan’s Hunter, the first novel in the series—and really, my first work as a serious writer. I was simply telling the story of a bodyguard who was protecting his feisty principal in the backwoods of Montana. But then I introduced Ethan and Sarah to the plot. As the manuscript started to unfold I became very intrigued with the idea of giving Ethan and Sarah a story of their own. Not long after finishing Morgan’s Hunter, I wrote Falling for Sarah, which was supposed to complete a two-book series. Then Austin and Hailey were added to the storyline, and I realized I had a series on my hands. The rest, you could say, is history!

Tell us about your upcoming book, Reagan’s Redemption. Who will we meet in this novel? What kind of excitement can we expect?Reagan's Redemption - Ebook

Reagan’s Redemption is the story of Doctor Reagan Rosner and her bodyguard, Shane Harper. Reagan is at a crossroads in her life after a heartbreaking and unexpected tragedy. Unsure of what to do, she joins The Appalachia Project, a government-run program aimed at bringing aid to some of America’s poorest citizens.

Shane Harper is assigned to keep an eye on Reagan and the pharmaceuticals they have on hand in the odd and often hostile little town of Black Bear Gap.

As Reagan and Shane work together to help a reluctant community, they uncover secrets the town intends to keep hidden at all costs.

You are a master at balancing both romance and suspense in your novels. How do you make sure you give your readers a healthy dose of both, without crossing any lines?

That’s a tricky question. Honestly, I’m not exactly sure how I do it. I love romantic suspense. I’ve read the genre for years, so I think I try hard to give my readers what I would want. Romance always plays the central theme in my stories, but sprinkling in elements of danger really adds something special. Love and romance are hard enough, but when the characters’ lives are in peril and the odds stacked against them, it heightens the entire experience. I love weaving the two together.

What sort of lessons do you hope your readers take away from your novels?

I don’t typically write with messages for my readers. Basically, reality bites sometimes and I love to give my readers a place where they can go and get lost in someone else’s problems for a while. Mostly the stories I tell are for pure entertainment. I strive to make my characters flawed and relatable and their experiences exciting yet plausible.

You’re quite the prolific author. How do you keep coming up with fresh ideas on a similar theme?

I spend my time off watching lots and lots of crime television. When I find myself running low on ideas, I sit down with a pad of paper, turn on the television, and wait for a documentary or situation on a crime show to pique my interest. When I see something special my brain kicks into high gear and ideas just start flying. Sometimes I can see scenes for the new story I will tell in my head right then and there—one of the true gifts of an overactive imagination!

What is your editing process like?

Typically I write in a three-draft form. First draft is getting the ideas down in a loose story form. My second draft is when I get the story right by adding more of the emotive and physical descriptions, and the third is when I run my manuscript through a program called AutoCrit Editing Wizard. The program helps me find overused words, slow passages, so on and so forth so that when I send my work off to Liam at Invisible Ink Editing he’ll have as clean of a copy as I can give him.

What is your publishing process like?

I self-publish, so my publicist and I handle the workload ourselves. We do lots of blog tours and interviews. I also spend a lot of time with my Facebook fans on my author page getting them ready for the launch of each new story. I think that is one of my favorite parts of this whole journey—meeting and interacting with so many great people.

Do you have any advice for budding authors?

Never give up on your dreams. When I started out in this business I almost quit after the first editor I contacted told me I couldn’t write and I shouldn’t quit my day job. Luckily, I have a lot of really supportive people in my life who encouraged me to keep writing. I’m glad I did because telling stories is one of my biggest passions and has changed my life for the better. Write because you love it and the rest usually falls into place.

Last question—you are being pursued by thieves intent on stealing your latest manuscript. Which of the hunks from your book would you want to protect you?

Oh, wow. This is truly an impossible question to answer! All of the agents from Ethan Cooke Security are more than capable of keeping my manuscript and me safe, but they’re all so different and intriguing in their own ways. It’s kind of like asking which of your children do you love more. I love them both with the same power but their unique qualities are what make me adore them. How’s that for an answer?

Categories
Self Publishing Advice Writing Advice

Your indie novel is a (beautiful) gutter

It’s an ugly metaphor, but it’s one that makes sense to me as a professional editor. Think of your story as a gutter running along the side of a house. Making up that gutter is the meat of your story: plot, characterization, setting, style—everything. Your goal is to nab your reader and pull him or her through the gutter, not unlike the itsy bitsy spider. But your reader needs to make it smoothly from the opening of the gutter (your first page) to the spout at the end (your final page).

Readers must pass through your novel like water through a gutter.

Unfortunately, as anyone who’s spent time on a roof will tell you, gutters get clogged. Big clumps of muck block the passageway, making it impossible for water—your readers—to pass through unhindered.

When you sit down for a proofreading or editing session, you want to clear out all of the gunk until your gutters are clean enough to eat out of. Then you can focus on enhancing the most valuable parts of the story. It can be difficult, however, to see all that gunk when you’re so immersed in the narrative, and that’s why a second set of eyes is a crucial step in the editing process.

My fellow book editors and I spend much of our time identifying and eliminating the muck from manuscripts, particularly when we provide a literary edit. However, indie authors also need to be on the lookout for the gunk when reviewing their own pieces. So don’t be afraid to get on those rubber gloves and start cleaning those gutters, baby.

—Liam Carnahan, Founder and Chief Editor of Invisible Ink Editing